The NBA Finals took a significant turn just before Game 3 (Wednesday, 8:30 p.m. ET on ABC) when the Boston Celtics announced that Kristaps Porzingis had sustained a “rare injury,” casting doubt on his availability for Wednesday’s game against the Dallas Mavericks and potentially for the remainder of the series.
Porzingis has a torn medial retinaculum in his left leg, though he expressed his willingness to do everything possible to play. However, Celtics coach Joe Mazzulla emphasized that the final decision would rest with the team doctors.
Prior to the Finals, Porzingis had missed five weeks due to a right calf injury but returned for Game 1. He has been averaging 16 points on 60% shooting and contributing 2.5 blocks per game, helping the Celtics secure a 2-0 lead over the Mavericks in Boston.
What Does This Mean for the Celtics and Mavericks? Our NBA Insiders Discuss:
Fill in the Blank: The News on Kristaps Porzingis’ Injury Was __.
Tim Bontemps: Concerning. The Celtics have established a strong position in the Finals. With Porzingis on the court, Boston is plus-25 in the series, highlighting his impact. His uncertain status increases the difficulty of maintaining control on the road.
Tim MacMahon: Perplexing. The Celtics’ announcement was complex, and Mazzulla’s labeling it a “serious injury” while listing Porzingis as day-to-day adds to the confusion. It’s an ironic twist, given Porzingis’ injury history with Dallas.
Dave McMenamin: A reminder. The Mavericks, down 2-0, could see a potential opening if Porzingis is out, making the series more competitive.
If Porzingis Is Limited or Out, How Does That Change the Series?
MacMahon: This shifts the focus for the Mavericks to attacking the paint, as Boston’s rim protection is notably strong with Porzingis. His absence could enable Dallas to exploit their strength in dunks and layups.
McMenamin: Porzingis’ 16 points per game are significant, but Al Horford could step up. Horford has been efficient, especially in the earlier rounds, and might fill the gap if needed.
Bontemps: Boston’s defense, particularly against lob plays, could suffer without Porzingis. Managing Horford’s minutes will be crucial, as extended playtime has shown to affect his performance.
Fact or Fiction? Boston Can Still Sweep the Mavs Without Porzingis.
McMenamin: Fiction. Sweeps are rare, and if Dallas can improve their shooting at home, they should extend the series.
Bontemps: Fact, though unlikely. The Celtics have controlled the first two games despite not shooting at their best. If they maintain their defensive and offensive strategies, a sweep is possible but not expected.
MacMahon: Fiction. Whether Porzingis plays or not, a sweep is improbable. A strong performance from Irving and improved bench contributions could prevent a sweep
